Monday, September 16, 2013
They are my kids too...
The book "Other People's Children" by Lisa Delpit raises an interesting arguement that we as educators may not have been atuned to before reading this selection. Delpit writes about the "silenced dialogue" and the power that language has over our students. I have to admit that I read this same article when I was an undergraduate and at the time felt no real connection to the material. But now, after having been teaching for a few years, my feelings are very different. Right off the bat, the wording of other people's children put me on guard. When I think of my students I do not think of them as someone else's child, I think of them as my own child. I try to treat them all as my children. Reflecting on and thinking about dialogue in my classroom, it is a place where I try to make everyone have a voice. I was shocked by the many student reflections in the article about not being heard. It made me wonder if my students feel that way too. Am I hearing their real voices? Or am I hearing the voice that they have been taught to share? I love the explanation of ethnographic analysis, the giving voice to alternate worldviews. This I think is crucial in the classroom. Listening to the experiences of different cultures and ways of life enrich my classroom tremendously. Yes, I teach Catholicism, but hearing about the religious experiences of my students who are not Catholic make my class so much more interesting and full. The five aspects of power were interesting to me for a few reasons. I want to talk about a few of them. "There are codes or rules for participating in power; that is, there is a "culture of power."(25) This is a reality of the society and world that we live in. I understand that the culture of power may not be the culture that our students are accustomed to, but I would argue that if we do not teach them within the constrains of this culture of power than we are doing them a disservice. We are not preparing them for success after they leave our classrooms. If my students lived in the bubble of my classroom for the rest of their lives and could be successful without every leaving my room, then yes I would say that I could teach to them in the culture that they were accustomed to. But because that is not reality if I do not speak to them in the proper manner, or expect them to speak in that way, I feel as though I would be setting them up to fail in a situation in the world outside of school. Delpit speaks about this when talking about the Native American student and her writing.She writes that "to bring this student into the program and pass ehr through without attending to obvious deficits in the codes needed for her to function effectively as a teacher is equally criminal"(38) So where is the line? How do we gauge between allowing our students to speak/write/communicate in the way that they are most comfortable with and teaching them the "proper" way to speak/write/communicate? The next aspect, "The rules of the culture of power are a reflection of the rules of the culture of those who have power" (25). While I agree with this statement, I find it interesting that Delpit speaks about middle class children and the structure of teaching geared toward them. I would argue that if the middle class is shrinking then they are no longer the majority-so shouldn't the structure change to reflect that? "Teachers do students no service to suggest, even implicitly that "product" is not important. In this country, students will be judged on their product regardless of the process they utilized to achieve it" (31). This statement spoke to me as a result of our conversation about SCWAAMP. Being an able-bodied member of society, one that can contribute goods and be productive is important to the culture of power. Thinking about this culture speak in language makes me think that instead of making the classroom more inclusive of difference it just sets up an even bigger segregation or divide. I also feel like it could be insulting to a student to speak to them in the same manner as say a parent. I feel like acting in this way could just set up more stereotypes toward a certain culture or race. In my reading, I subscribe to a magazine called "Teaching Tolerance". They also run a website version of the magazine. In the issue for this month, there is an article called "Is My School Racist" Intereseting read, along with the other resources on the website.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I would like to think that my students "are my kids, too". The reality is, they are not because of our cultural divide. I want them to succeed, of course, as if they were my own children. However, in order to do my job well, I must take into account what they bring to the classroom in terms of previous learning content and styles. So, I was not offended by the idea that they "are other", because the reality is they come to my classroom with different perspectives. I know, for instance, that my students' parents want me to focus on building skills that will allow them to build fluency and comprehension as well as a native speaker. In order to do so I must combine process and skills-based learning.
ReplyDeleteI actually agree with you wholeheartedly, Allie! Like you, I consider the students to be "my kids,too." I try to create a warm, inviting, safe environment knowing that coming to class may be the best part of their day for some of them. We both know that our students are not our own children, but I use my learning experiences from home with my kids at school, and my learning experiences from school at home with my kids. I do not assume or presume to know about anyone's culture other than my own, but I do like to learn about them and to any extent possible, find out about their own lives. I do not have a very culturally diverse classroom, but I really don't think I would do too much differently if I did. Each and every kid has a different perspective, regardless of race, language, class, or his or her sexuality, and I think it's great that you try to make connections and love them enough to consider them your own.
ReplyDeleteAllie I do agree with you!! I tell my 8th grade students at the beginning of each school year that they are my students for life. I still stay in touch with students that are married with children. They still come and visit.Like Amy I also bring my own experiences from home and share them with my students and also I share school experiences with my own children. I know that this has made my own children more open minded and more empathetic towards others
ReplyDeleteafter reading both of these books, I am also wondering what my kids are thinking and second guessing my actions. For the past couple of weeks I have been thinking about the word "privilege" and "power" and I admit they are not the most comfortable words.
ReplyDeleteI was also interested in the part about the Native American Student who would have been denied access by what the author referred to as the "gatekeeper". I do understand the concept very well because I have had both good and bad experiences with people who either allowed or denied me access. Although, I was never told that I should never attempt to become a teacher. Delpit never argued that the student should not learn the fundamental concepts of technical writing. He suggested that it was shameful that the student was denied access to a support structure that would provide help with his/her deficiencies. I would definitely agree with Delpit conclusions.
good fodder for conversation here, Allie. At one point you say, "I understand that the culture of power may not be the culture that our students are accustomed to, but I would argue that if we do not teach them within the constrains of this culture of power than we are doing them a disservice. We are not preparing them for success after they leave our classrooms..." Delpit agrees with you 1000% -- this is her entire premise, in fact. Now, what does that look like in practice?
ReplyDeleteI too feel like these children are my children. In fact, when I say "my kids" my friends all ask, "your students or your kids?" because I do not differentiate otherwise. I also agree with you that if we begin letting them do in academia as they do in their lives then will in some regard be preparing them to fail eventually. However, I must say that by being to strict with the conventions of academia is in part silencing those kids. They have a story to tell and we have to allow them to do that first, before stifling them with proper grammar (which if anybody is checking I SUCK AT). There certainly is a give and take between process and skill, but I think it would be more appropriate in this case to say "accept and translate". Let them tell their story then teach them how to translate it.
ReplyDelete