Sunday, October 20, 2013

Literacy with attitude...

"Literacy with an Attitude" by Patrick Finn is an account of the education system here in America, and how it differs based on socio-economic status. It is also an account of challenging the status quo, making education real for students, and having fun in the process. In the first part of the reading, Finn writes about the inequalities in what and how students are being taught. "People can become conscious of injustice and inequity, and through disciplined, focused, and strategic action, they can bring about change". This disciplined, focused, strategic action has to, I think, start in our classrooms.  Where we highlight the injustices and inequities and do not let students think that this is "just the way that it is". I am currently at a conference in Baltimore, and a few experiences that I had today really rang true to Finn's writing. For example, a teacher at a pretty wealthy school was speaking of the number of AP classes that are available to her students. She was saying how they can start to take them as sophomores, and can take up to 5 of them as seniors, and how because of this they are stressed out with their workload. I immediately thought of my school and the number of AP classes that we offer, which does not even compare to the other school. It lead me to think, is it because my students are not from the upper-middle class? Is it because my school does not think that they would need access to that many upper level classes? What are the determining factors in that decision? I also immediately thought about the things that are stressing out my students. For most, it is not school related. They are stressed about their home life. Where are they sleeping that night? Is there going to be dinner? Will mom have another new boyfriend over the house? Why does my mom keep telling me to act like a man, when I have not had a good man in my life? It really is interesting to me the different struggles that our students are facing and where those struggles stem from. Does my school not offer more AP classes because my students don't want to take them, or because somewhere is this idea that they can't handle them among the other things they are dealing with?
What are we working to prepare our students for? Are we forcing them into a mold based on their economic status?  Finn made me take a look at my own teaching. Am I, as he says, "schooling these children, not to take charge of their lives, but to take orders"? Some of the structure of school does indeed lead kids to take orders, but I think that is part of life in the real world. There is always someone in charge, an authority. That does not mean, however, that students in our classrooms should be taught to just spit back facts and "tell me what I want to hear". I find that more and more students are asking me "to just tell them whats on the test" so that they know exactly what to study, instead of being able to draw conclusions on their own. In so many ways, creativity is being taken out of schools. I know that last week Mary linked a Ken Robinson video in her blog about creativity in education, and I have used that video with graduating seniors to see if they agree with Robinson or not. It is sad that they agree that most of their creativity is gone as a result of their education. At this conference, the keynote asked us to think about the "seeds" that we are sowing in our students and to list the top ten. What are the top ten things that are most important to me that I want my students to walk out and have experienced/learned? Is the content really the important part, or is it more important that my students felt respected, that they know that someone cares about them? Finn would say that many schools would completely reject anything not content driven, and how can they not, because they are driven by state tests. Unfortunately there is no section of the test that asks about life experience, and how students learn to respect each other, or about the time they finally felt that their voice was heard. I feel lucky that I have so much wiggle room in my curriculum that it was fine for me for example, to take a whole class period and discuss the N word, other negative slang words and their implications and how its disrespectful to speak to each other in that way. Will I ever test on that? No, but was it a valuable lesson, nonetheless? I think, yes. I try and make real world connections with my students everyday. I think this is important teaching Theology because they do not all believe in the faith that I am teaching them about.
I love so much of what Finn writes about empowering our students to rise above the lot they have been given. Society, and people who are not in the classroom teaching are afraid of what would happen if there were people rising up from the bottom. Finn writes "What would happen if working-class students had political motives for acquiring literacy"?It is my job, I believe, to teach students to have motives, and not settle.


2 comments:

  1. First of all Allie, I'm looking forward to hearing about your conference! I thought about the AP class issue and how elite schools offer more of them and at an earlier age. Those types of classes are indeed geared toward Finn's definition of elite students - those who are expected to perform at high levels and who are self motivated to get the job done. I think the best model is the upper middle class one wherein creativity and inquiry is the main focus - I see problems, of course, with the working class model, but also with the elite one. Both of them - at extremes - caste students into roles they may not want. Elite students may not have the stamina for the types of pressure AP classes demand - and especially at 10th grade. I'm also jealous that you have leeway in your curriculum. Teaching theology, and therefore, values and morals, seems to be a perfect fit with what we are learning in this class.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have a hard time believing that the reason for not having more AP classes is socio-economic status. I believe what we have is a values problem in this country whereas parents are not valuing education and creating high standards at home. One of the determining factors in determining AP classes is student test scores however; another is the number of teachers who have the ability to teach AP classes. What I find hard to know is that students are denied access to AP classes when there is not enough room. Students should not be denied access and that to me is a problem.

    I do agree with you that students who are focusing on problems at home (family troubles) do not come ready to learn the next day. There focus is elsewhere and with good reason. Also, after reading Finn I focused on where the teachers come from in the study on the elementary schools. That could explain why there are not enough AP teachers to go around. For example, working class teachers usually come from local places however; they usually come from a better area and are not connected to the students (where they live).

    ReplyDelete